1. Executive summary July to September 2023
Summary of achieved sample size
The achieved sample size for the UK Labour Force Survey (LFS) during July to September 2023 (JS23) was 44,238 individuals in 20,453 households. Please note that there were no NHS households in this period. Compared with the previous quarter April to June 2023 (AJ23), this represents a decrease of 17.0% in achieved person interviews and a decrease of 16.8% in household interviews.
Due to greater uncertainty in survey estimates produced from this achieved sample, outputs derived from these data have therefore been temporarily suspended.
Summary of response rates
Please note that historical reports can also be accessed.
In JS23, main response rates were as follows:
the total response rate for Great Britain excluding imputed cases (Table 4) was 12.7%; this is down 1.9 percentage points on the previous quarter
the response rate excluding imputed cases (Figure 3) was 30.5% in wave 1 and 9.7% in wave 5; this compares with 27.9% and 11.0% respectively in the previous quarter
the total response rate for Great Britain including imputed cases (Table 5) was 16%, down 2.3 percentage points on the previous quarter
of non-response in JS23 (Figure 5), non-contacts comprised 6.8% (down 3.4 percentage points on the previous quarter), circumstantial refusals were 2.4% (unchanged from the previous quarter), outright refusals comprised 32.44% (down 1.5 percentage points on the previous quarter) and other refusals comprised the remainder
the English region with the highest accumulated response rate across the five waves (Table 8) was the South West (20.7%); the lowest was Inner London (9.7%)
the overall proxy response rate (Table 9) was 37.8%; the highest proxy response rates occur in the 16 to 17 years age group (97.3%), in males (39.7%) and in the non-White ethnicity group (45.5%)
the average income response rate (Table 10) was 82.4%
the data on attrition rates are shown in Table 11; these data reveal in percentage change terms that those who drop out of the survey between waves 1 and 5 are over-represented in the 30-39 age bands, unemployed, in households with six or more people, and in the West Midlands Metropolitan Council region
A breakdown of main characteristic changes has been included in the "Respondent characteristics" section.
There have been several methodological and operational changes that may have affected response rates. More details on these changes are outlined in Section 7: Comparability.
Respondent characteristics
To identify any potential impact on the estimates, a range of characteristics have been investigated, including age, sex, and tenure. The main changes to respondent characteristics are as follows.
Age
Proportions for all age brackets for wave 1 respondents have remained relatively stable since July to September 2022 (JS22) (see Table 1).
Tenure
The proportions for tenure of responding household reference person (HRPs) have remained relatively stable since JS22.
Country of birth
In JS23, 12.7% of wave 1 interviews comprised non-UK born respondents. This is up from 12.2% in the previous year (JS22). The current proportion of non-UK born respondents is consistent with January to March 2020 (JM20) (see Figure A).
Waves 2 to 5
Looking at waves 2 to 5, proportions in each age band have remained relatively stable over the last year.
For waves 2 to 5, 51% of responding HRPs owned their property outright in JS23, compared with 47% in JS22. The proportion of HRPs buying their home with a mortgage or loan decreased from 29% to 26% over the same time period. The proportion of renters has remained stable at around 22%.
Wave 1 responding | Under 16 | 16-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-54 | 55-64 | 65 and over |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JS22 | 16% | 7% | 10% | 11% | 12% | 16% | 27% |
OD22 | 17% | 7% | 10% | 11% | 13% | 15% | 27% |
JM23 | 17% | 7% | 10% | 12% | 13% | 14% | 28% |
AJ23 | 18% | 7% | 10% | 12% | 12% | 15% | 27% |
JS23 | 17% | 7% | 10% | 12% | 12% | 15% | 28% |
Download this table Table 1: Age of respondents from July to September 2022 to July to September 2023, Wave 1
.xls .csv
Wave 1 responding HRP | Owned outright | Being bought with mortgage or loan | Part rent | Rented | Rent free |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JS22 | 46% | 26% | 1% | 27% | 1% |
OD22 | 45% | 26% | 1% | 27% | 1% |
JM23 | 45% | 26% | 1% | 27% | 1% |
AJ23 | 45% | 26% | 1% | 26% | 1% |
JS23 | 46% | 26% | 1% | 26% | 1% |
Download this table Table 2: Tenure of household reference person from July to September 2022 to July to September 2023, wave 1
.xls .csv
Figure A: Country of birth of respondents from January 2020 to September 2023, Wave 1
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- JM20 refers to January to March 2020; AJ20 refers to April to June 2020; JS20 refers to July to September 2020; OD20 refers to October to December 2020, JM21 refers to January to March 2021, AJ21 refers to April to June 2021; JS21 refers to July to September 2021, OD21 refers to October to December 2021; JM22 refers to January to March 2022; AJ22 refers to April to June 2022 JS22 refers to July to September 2022; OD22 refers to October to December 2022; JM23 refers to January to March 2023; AJ23 refers to April to June 2023, JS23 refers to July to September 2023.
Download this chart Figure A: Country of birth of respondents from January 2020 to September 2023, Wave 1
Image .csv .xlsWhile some changes in the demographic coverage of the survey would be dealt with in the weighting processes, this only covers age, sex, and location. To mitigate the impact of the non-response bias in the LFS caused by changes to the way people were contacted for initial interviews since March 2020, the LFS has introduced housing tenure into the weighting methodology. While not providing a perfect solution, this has redressed some of the issues that had previously been noted in the survey results.
As a result, we have moved to using the new tenure weighting from January to March 2020 onwards for all LFS and APS microdata, to help ensure they are produced on a consistent basis. There may also be further refinements to the methodology, such as constraining the tenure weighting within region, that lead to further improvements and revisions in the future. We will continue investigating these options and implement them if they are of sufficiently significant benefit.
As all interviewing had to be conducted over the phone since March 2020, phone contact details had to be obtained for the wave 1 sample. To reduce the un-productive case work rotated forward into future waves, and with that the interviewer burden, a decision was taken to code out wave 3 cases as refusals from January to March 2021 (JM21) that were unproductive in the previous two waves.
This change in methodology is now reflected in the refusal rates for wave 2, wave 3, wave 4 and wave 5 cases in April to June (AJ22) (see Tables 4 to 7 and Figure 5). A large increase in refusals to HQ can be seen for wave 2, wave 3, wave 4 and wave 5 cases resulting from cases that were unproductive in wave 1 (July to September 2021), wave 2 (October to December 2021), wave 3 (January to March 2022) and wave 4 (April to June 2022) being intentionally coded as refusal to influence case rotation.
Because of the sharp decrease in response rates with the onset of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the LFS wave 1 sample was doubled from July to September 2020 (JS20), to ensure achieved sample sizes could be maintained, and reduced again from April 2021 onwards. Read more in "Fieldwork and operational changes" in Section 7: Comparability.
With July to September 2023, the issued sample returned to the pre-coronavirus pandemic level. This was to enable more effective use of field resources across all ONS social survey data collection exercises. However, because of resources in the field being stretched across a number of priorities, the reduction in the issued sample did not lead to a significant increase in the response rate. The achieved sample therefore saw a significant drop, which affected the data quality.
More information on the work being carried out and an outline of changes to other ONS surveys during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic are available.
The impact of changes made to the LFS in response to the coronavirus pandemic, and the methods used to adjust the data is available.
Indicative estimates of the LFS reweighting methodology on key indicators for January to March 2020 to October to December 2020.
New population weights using PAYE Real-Time Information data to allow for changes to LFS collection methods, and changes to population movements in 2020, applied to LFS results from July 2021.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys2. Summary of quality
Relevance
(The degree to which the statistical product meets user needs for both coverage and content.)
Primary purpose
The primary purpose of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) is "the prompt publication of key aggregate, whole economy indicators, for the integrated assessment of labour market conditions" (Review of the Labour Force Survey, Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2002). The labour market covers all aspects of people's work, including the education and training needed to equip them for work, the jobs themselves, job-search for those out of work, and income from work and benefits.
Users and uses
Users of LFS data often combine them with related data from other sources to provide an overall view of the state of the labour market. One of the most important users of this sort of assessment is the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee, that sets interest rates to meet the government's inflation target.
Other important users of LFS data are HM Treasury and the Department for Work and Pensions. Because they are responsible for UK economic and labour market policy, they are interested in a variety of indicators of the state of the labour market, including the number of people in employment, the number of hours worked and the number of unemployed people (defined according to the International Labour Organization (ILO)). They often analyse these series by age groups, by regions and by sex. Other government users include:
- Department for Business and Trade
- Home Office
- Health and Safety Executive
- Department for Transport
- Scottish Government
- Welsh Government
At the international level, LFS data are used by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the ILO.
Other users include:
- Local authorities
- Trades Union Congress (TUC)
- Employer's Association
- Confederation of British Industry
- Institute of Employment Studies
- Institute for Public Policy Research
- National Institute of Economic and Social Research
- Policy Studies Institute
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
- academic researchers
- media
- general public
Strengths and limitations
The main strengths of the LFS include that:
- it has the largest coverage of any household survey in the UK and can therefore generate statistics for small geographical areas
- the sampling errors are relatively small, as a result of the wave structure and the size of the survey
- the survey covers a large range of employment-related variables and non-employment-related variables, allowing cross-linking analyses to be undertaken (for example, earnings against educational attainment)
The main limitations of the LFS include that:
- the sample design provides no guarantee of adequate coverage of any industry, as the survey is not industrially stratified
- the LFS coverage omits communal establishments, except NHS housing and students in halls of residence and at boarding schools; members of the armed forces are only included if they live in private accommodation and workers aged 16 years and under are not covered
- while the LFS data are used alongside other sources to feed into the estimates of population change, the main focus of the survey is to collect labour market information and as such is not designed to measure migration flows
Main definitions
The definitions of the three economic activity groups – employed, unemployed and economically inactive – that are used in the LFS are the standard ILO definitions. It should be noted that although the LFS uses ILO definitions, these definitions are not interpreted and applied in exactly the same way in different countries. For example, although "working age" is a common term, different countries have different statutory school leaving and retirement ages. However, Eurostat collects data from different countries and adjusts them to produce comparable estimates.
Accuracy
(The closeness between an estimated result and the (unknown) true value.)
The main threats to accuracy are sources of error, namely sampling error and non-sampling error, where non- sampling error includes:
- coverage error
- non-response error
- measurement error
- processing error
- model assumption error
Many of the sources of non-sampling error are difficult to measure. However, the LFS publishes detailed response rates for all waves of the survey and an overall response rate, including data time series (Tables 4 to 7 and Figures 3 and 5). Response rates are also published by country and region for each wave during the particular quarter (Table 8). The LFS also publishes proxy response rates (Table 9), response rates for income questions by National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) (Table 10), and attrition rates (Table 11).
Surveys, such as the LFS, usually provide estimates of population characteristics rather than exact measures. In principle, many random samples could be drawn, and each would give different results. This is because each sample would be made up of different people, who would give different answers to the questions asked. The spread of these results is the sampling variability, that generally reduces with increasing sample size.
A confidence interval is a range of values, defined by a lower and upper bound, that indicates the variability of an estimate. Statistical methods are used to calculate the sampling variability from which the confidence interval can be determined. For example, with a 95% confidence interval, it is expected that in 95% of the survey samples, the resulting confidence interval will contain the true value that would be obtained by surveying the whole population.
The LFS routinely publishes details of achieved sample sizes in terms of achieved number of household and person interviews (Table 3 and Figures 1 and 2) and sampling variability for estimates of main variables. With the suspension of the publishing of LFS estimates, these have not been published for the latest period, but sampling variability (95% confidence intervals) for prior periods can be found in the Sampling variability A11: Labour Force Survey sampling variability dataset of the latest Labour market statistical bulletin.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys3. Achieved sample
GB | UK | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Includes imputed | Excludes imputed | Includes imputed | Excludes imputed | ||
Private households | 17,824 | 14,180 | 20,453 | 16,645 | |
Individuals in private households | 38,034 | 29,220 | 44,238 | 34,965 | |
NHS Households | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Individuals in NHS households | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Total households | 17,824 | 14,180 | 20,453 | 16,645 | |
Total individuals | 38,034 | 29,220 | 44,238 | 34,965 |
Download this table Table 3: Achieved sample by type of household
.xls .csv
Figure 1: Achieved number of household interviews
Great Britain and UK, between July to September 2013 and July to September 2023
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Download this chart Figure 1: Achieved number of household interviews
Image .csv .xls
Figure 2: Achieved number of person interviews
Great Britain and UK, between July to September 2013 and July to September 2023
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Download this chart Figure 2: Achieved number of person interviews
Image .csv .xls4. Response rates
This section provides detailed response rates for the Labour Force Survey (LFS) for different waves and geographies.
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 2 in JS23 | Wave 3 in JS23 | Wave 4 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | |
Eligible households found at selected units | 15,618 | 100.0 | 23,983 | 100.0 | 23,961 | 100.0 | 23,906 | 100.0 | 23,813 | 100.0 | 111,281 | 100.0 |
Responding units | ||||||||||||
Total | 4,771 | 30.5 | 2,818 | 11.7 | 2,240 | 9.3 | 2,052 | 8.6 | 2,299 | 9.7 | 14,180 | 12.7 |
Full | 4,531 | 29.0 | 2,521 | 10.5 | 2,031 | 8.5 | 1,889 | 7.9 | 2,086 | 8.8 | 13,058 | 11.7 |
Partial | 240 | 1.5 | 297 | 1.2 | 209 | 0.9 | 163 | 0.7 | 213 | 0.9 | 1,122 | 1.0 |
Non-responding units | ||||||||||||
Circum -stantial refusal | 1,394 | 8.9 | 853 | 3.6 | 623 | 2.6 | 439 | 1.8 | 310 | 1.3 | 3,619 | 3.3 |
Outright refusal | 3,732 | 23.9 | 6,269 | 26.1 | 6,678 | 27.9 | 6,931 | 29.0 | 6,695 | 28.1 | 30,305 | 27.2 |
Refusal to HQ | 987 | 6.3 | 11,567 | 48.2 | 12,720 | 53.1 | 13,072 | 54.7 | 13,307 | 55.9 | 51,653 | 46.4 |
Non-contact | 4,734 | 30.3 | 1,778 | 7.4 | 986 | 4.1 | 633 | 2.6 | 481 | 2.0 | 8,612 | 7.7 |
Addresses not issued for interviewing | ||||||||||||
Refusal to re-interview | n/a | n/a | 698 | 2.9 | 714 | 3.0 | 779 | 3.3 | 721 | 3.0 | 2,912 | 2.6 |
Co-operation rate | 43.8 | 13.1 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 14.2 | ||||||
Contact rate | 63.4 | 42.7 | 41.0 | 40.7 | 40.3 | 44.4 |
Download this table Table 4: Wave-specific response rates, excluding imputed households
.xls .csv
Figure 3: Wave-specific response rates
Great Britain, excluding imputed households, between July to September 2013 and July to September 2023
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Notes:
Excludes households for which response has been imputed.
The total response rate is the cumulative response rate for the quarter across all waves, based on all eligible, in-scope households.
For a full definition of response categories and the method used to calculate the response rates, see Section 10: Technical definitions.
Download this chart Figure 3: Wave-specific response rates
Image .csv .xls
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 2 in JS23 | Wave 3 in JS23 | Wave 4 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | |
Eligible households found at selected units | 15,618 | 100 | 23,983 | 100 | 23,961 | 100 | 23,906 | 100 | 23,813 | 100 | 111,281 | 100 |
Responding units | ||||||||||||
Total | 4,771 | 30.5 | 4,760 | 19.8 | 3,042 | 12.7 | 2,579 | 10.8 | 2,673 | 11.2 | 17,825 | 16.0 |
Full | 4,531 | 29.0 | 2,521 | 10.5 | 2,031 | 8.5 | 1,889 | 7.9 | 2,086 | 8.8 | 13,058 | 11.7 |
Partial | 240 | 1.5 | 297 | 1.2 | 209 | 0.9 | 163 | 0.7 | 213 | 0.9 | 1,122 | 1.0 |
Imputed | - | - | 1942 | 8.1 | 802 | 3.3 | 527 | 2.2 | 374 | 1.6 | 3,645 | 3.3 |
Non-responding units | ||||||||||||
Circumstantial refusal | 1,394 | 8.9 | 194 | 0.8 | 294 | 1.2 | 206 | 0.9 | 161 | 0.7 | 2,249 | 2.0 |
Outright refusal | 3,732 | 23.9 | 6,269 | 26.1 | 6,678 | 27.9 | 6,931 | 29.0 | 6,695 | 28.1 | 30,305 | 27.2 |
Refusal to HQ | 987 | 6.3 | 11,567 | 48.2 | 12,720 | 53.1 | 13,072 | 54.7 | 13,307 | 55.9 | 51,653 | 46.4 |
Non-contact | 4,734 | 30.3 | 495 | 2.1 | 513 | 2.1 | 339 | 1.4 | 256 | 1.1 | 6,337 | 5.7 |
Addresses not issued for interviewing | ||||||||||||
Refusal to re-interview | n/a | n/a | 698 | 2.9 | 714 | 3.0 | 779 | 3.3 | 721 | 3.0 | 2,912 | 2.6 |
Co-operation rate | 43.8 | 20.9 | 13.4 | 11.3 | 11.7 | 17.5 | ||||||
Contact rate | 63.4 | 48.2 | 43.1 | 42.0 | 41.3 | 46.5 |
Download this table Table 5: Wave-specific response rates, including imputed households
.xls .csv
Figure 4: Wave specific response rates by week
Great Britain, excluding imputed households, July to September 2023
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- All selected addresses are distributed equally across the 13 weeks of the quarter.
Download this chart Figure 4: Wave specific response rates by week
Image .csv .xls
Figure 5: Composition of non-response
Great Britain, including imputed household, July to September 2023
Source: Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics
Notes:
For definitions of the types of non-response, see Section 10: Technical definitions. Figures are based on the aggregate response for the quarter covering all waves.
JS23 refers to the period July to September 2023.
AJ23 refers to the period April to June 2023.
JS22 refers to the period July to September 2022.
JS21 refers to the period July to September 2021.
Download this chart Figure 5: Composition of non-response
Image .csv .xls
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 2 in JS23 | Wave 3 in JS23 | Wave 4 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | |
Eligible households found at selected units | 16,786 | 100 | 25,216 | 100 | 25,173 | 100 | 25,097 | 100 | 25,009 | 100 | 117,281 | 100 |
Responding units | ||||||||||||
Total | 5,404 | 32.2 | 3,240 | 12.8 | 2,708 | 10.8 | 2,552 | 10.2 | 2,741 | 11.0 | 16,645 | 14.2 |
Full | 5,109 | 30.4 | 2,923 | 11.6 | 2,460 | 9.8 | 2,364 | 9.4 | 2,506 | 10.0 | 15,362 | 13.1 |
Partial | 295 | 1.8 | 317 | 1.3 | 248 | 1.0 | 188 | 0.7 | 235 | 0.9 | 1,283 | 1.1 |
Non-responding units | ||||||||||||
Circumstantial refusal | 1,461 | 8.7 | 881 | 3.5 | 648 | 2.6 | 455 | 1.8 | 328 | 1.3 | 3,773 | 3.2 |
Outright refusal | 4,030 | 24.0 | 6,286 | 24.9 | 6,699 | 26.6 | 6,944 | 27.7 | 6,705 | 26.8 | 30,664 | 26.1 |
Refusal to HQ | 992 | 5.9 | 11,568 | 45.9 | 12,722 | 50.5 | 13,072 | 52.1 | 13,307 | 53.2 | 51,661 | 44.0 |
Non-contact | 4,899 | 29.2 | 1,870 | 7.4 | 1,053 | 4.2 | 707 | 2.8 | 557 | 2.2 | 9,086 | 7.7 |
Addresses not issued for interviewing | ||||||||||||
Refusal to re-interview | n/a | n/a | 1371 | 5.4 | 1,343 | 5.3 | 1,367 | 5.4 | 1,371 | 5.5 | 5,452 | 4.6 |
Co-operation rate | 45.5 | 14.7 | 11.9 | 11.1 | 11.9 | 16.2 | ||||||
Contact rate | 64.9 | 43.6 | 42.2 | 41.9 | 41.3 | 45.7 |
Download this table Table 6: Wave-specific response rates, excluding imputed households
.xls .csv
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 2 in JS23 | Wave 3 in JS23 | Wave 4 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | |
Eligible households found at selected units | 16,786 | 100 | 25,216 | 100 | 25,173 | 100 | 25,097 | 100 | 25,009 | 100 | 117,281 | 100 |
Responding units | ||||||||||||
Total | 5,404 | 32.2 | 5,241 | 20.8 | 3,547 | 14.1 | 3,112 | 12.4 | 3,154 | 12.6 | 20,458 | 17.4 |
Full | 5,109 | 30.4 | 2,923 | 11.6 | 2,460 | 9.8 | 2,364 | 9.4 | 2,506 | 10.0 | 15,362 | 13.1 |
Partial | 295 | 1.8 | 317 | 1.3 | 248 | 1.0 | 188 | 0.7 | 235 | 0.9 | 1,283 | 1.1 |
Imputed | - | - | 2,001 | 7.9 | 839 | 3.3 | 560 | 2.2 | 413 | 1.7 | 3,813 | 3.3 |
Non-responding units | ||||||||||||
Circumstantial refusal | 1,461 | 8.7 | 208 | 0.8 | 308 | 1.2 | 216 | 0.9 | 170 | 0.7 | 2,363 | 2.0 |
Outright refusal | 4,030 | 24.0 | 6,286 | 24.9 | 6,699 | 26.6 | 6,944 | 27.7 | 6,705 | 26.8 | 30,664 | 26.1 |
Refusal to HQ | 992 | 5.9 | 11,568 | 45.9 | 12,722 | 50.5 | 13,072 | 52.1 | 13,307 | 53.2 | 51,661 | 44.0 |
Non-contact | 4,899 | 29.2 | 542 | 2.1 | 554 | 2.2 | 386 | 1.5 | 302 | 1.2 | 6,683 | 5.7 |
Addresses not issued for interviewing | ||||||||||||
Refusal to re-interview | n/a | n/a | 1371 | 5.4 | 1,343 | 5.3 | 1,367 | 5.4 | 1,371 | 5.5 | 5,452 | 4.6 |
Co-operation rate | 45.5 | 22.5 | 15.2 | 13.3 | 13.5 | 19.5 | ||||||
Contact rate | 64.9 | 49.2 | 44.3 | 43.3 | 42.4 | 47.8 |
Download this table Table 7: Wave-specific response rates, including imputed households
.xls .csv
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 2 in JS23 | Wave 3 in JS23 | Wave 4 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | ||||||
Tyne & Wear | 43.5 | 22.1 | 11.4 | 10.5 | 13.9 | 18.5 |
Rest of North East | 37.9 | 24.2 | 13.7 | 13.3 | 11.7 | 18.8 |
Greater Manchester | 19.3 | 13.7 | 8.2 | 9.2 | 9.5 | 11.5 |
Merseyside | 23.8 | 17.6 | 7.0 | 6.4 | 9.4 | 12.1 |
Rest of North West | 26.4 | 18.2 | 12.4 | 10.4 | 11.0 | 14.9 |
South Yorkshire | 41.1 | 22.7 | 9.4 | 12.4 | 10.9 | 17.6 |
West Yorkshire | 32.5 | 19.7 | 12.6 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 16.0 |
Rest of Yorkshire and Humberside | 40.8 | 20.6 | 14.8 | 9.7 | 13.5 | 18.3 |
East Midlands | 38.3 | 26.8 | 17.1 | 14.1 | 11.0 | 20.2 |
West Midlands Metropolitan Council | 29.6 | 19.5 | 9.6 | 8.0 | 8.4 | 13.9 |
Rest of West Midlands | 36.2 | 27.2 | 15.4 | 12.1 | 13.0 | 19.6 |
East of England | 30.0 | 20.5 | 13.9 | 11.6 | 14.0 | 17.1 |
Inner London | 18.7 | 12.3 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 9.7 |
Outer London | 22.5 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 6.4 | 8.0 | 10.3 |
South East | 30.7 | 20.4 | 13.6 | 11.3 | 11.0 | 16.4 |
South West | 39.3 | 24.5 | 17.6 | 14.4 | 14.1 | 20.7 |
England | 31.1 | 20.0 | 12.8 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 16.1 |
Wales | 30.2 | 24.8 | 13.7 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 17.3 |
Strathclyde | 24.4 | 13.9 | 7.8 | 7.6 | 12.5 | 12.4 |
Rest of Scotland | 26.1 | 18.0 | 14.5 | 12.1 | 11.3 | 15.8 |
Scotland | 25.4 | 16.3 | 11.6 | 10.2 | 11.8 | 14.3 |
Northern Ireland | 54.2 | 39.0 | 41.7 | 44.8 | 40.2 | 43.9 |
Download this table Table 8: Wave-specific response rates, including imputed households, by region
.xls .csv
All responses | Proxy | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Total (16+) | 31,891 | 12,042 | 37.8 |
16-17 | 808 | 786 | 97.3 | |
18-19 | 620 | 564 | 91.0 | |
20+ | 30,463 | 10,692 | 35.1 | |
Sex | Total | 31,891 | 12,042 | 37.8 |
Male | 15,324 | 6,088 | 39.7 | |
Female | 16,567 | 5,954 | 35.9 | |
Ethnicity | Total | 31,891 | 12,042 | 37.8 |
White | 28,547 | 10,514 | 36.8 | |
Non-white | 3,313 | 1,508 | 45.5 | |
Refused | 31 | 20 | 64.5 | |
Economic activity | Total | 31,891 | 12,042 | 37.8 |
(INECAC05) | Employees | 15,090 | 5,979 | 39.6 |
Self-Employed | 2,672 | 1,062 | 39.7 | |
Government schemes | 20 | 11 | 55.0 | |
Unpaid family workers | 62 | 19 | 30.6 | |
ILO Unemployed | 622 | 301 | 48.4 | |
Inactive | 13,425 | 4,670 | 34.8 |
Download this table Table 9: Proxy response
.xls .csv
Wave 1 in JS23 | Wave 5 in JS23 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
NS-SEC | % | % | % |
Higher managerial and professional | 81.6 | 93.0 | 85.3 |
Lower managerial and professional | 79.9 | 90.8 | 83.2 |
Intermediate occupations | 78.8 | 88.4 | 81.7 |
Small employers and own account workers | 60.0 | 80.0 | 70.0 |
Lower supervisory and technical | 81.6 | 87.5 | 83.2 |
Semi-routine occupations | 74.2 | 93.2 | 78.8 |
Routine occupations | 75.7 | 87.3 | 78.6 |
Total | 79.0 | 90.6 | 82.4 |
Download this table Table 10: Income response rates by NS-SEC
.xls .csv
Wave 1 in JS22 | Wave 5 in JS23 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Responds | Responds | Responds all waves | Non-responder | ||
Age | <16 | 18.2 | 11.7 | 10.7 | 21.0 |
16-19 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 4.4 | |
20-29 | 9.3 | 6.0 | 5.9 | 10.7 | |
30-39 | 12.5 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 14.5 | |
40-49 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 13.7 | |
50-59 | 15.6 | 15.4 | 15.2 | 15.6 | |
60-69 | 17.8 | 27.2 | 28.5 | 13.7 | |
70+ | 10.2 | 19.1 | 20.7 | 6.4 | |
Sex | Male | 48.3 | 48.3 | 48.4 | 48.3 |
Female | 51.7 | 51.7 | 51.6 | 51.7 | |
Economic Activity (INECAC05) | Employees | 42.2 | 36.5 | 35.2 | 44.7 |
Self-Employed | 7.5 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 7.7 | |
Government schemes | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Unpaid family workers | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
ILO Unemployed | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | |
Inactive | 30.5 | 43.5 | 46.2 | 24.9 | |
Number of people in household (TOTNUM) | 1 | 11.5 | 16.6 | 17.7 | 9.4 |
2 | 33.9 | 44.0 | 45.7 | 29.5 | |
3 | 20.6 | 16.9 | 15.9 | 22.2 | |
4 | 21.7 | 15.0 | 14.8 | 24.6 | |
5 | 7.8 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 8.8 | |
6 or more | 4.4 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 5.5 | |
Region (GOVTOR) | Tyne & Wear | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
Rest of North East | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 3.0 | |
Greater Manchester | 4.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 4.9 | |
Merseyside | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | |
Rest of North West | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.7 | |
South Yorkshire | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.5 | |
West Yorkshire | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 4.4 | |
Rest of Yorkshire and Humberside | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.3 | |
East Midlands | 8.6 | 7.6 | 7.0 | 9.1 | |
West Midlands Metropolitan Council | 4.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 4.8 | |
Rest of West Midlands | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
East of England | 11.1 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 10.2 | |
Inner London | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.6 | |
Outer London | 5.7 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 6.0 | |
South East | 12.9 | 15.2 | 15.3 | 12.0 | |
South West | 9.6 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 8.9 | |
Wales | 5.2 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
Strathclyde | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.0 | |
Rest of Scotland | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.8 |
Download this table Table 11: Summary of attrition by main characteristics
.xls .csv5. Timeliness and punctuality
(Timeliness refers to the lapse of time between publication and the period to which the data refer. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the actual and planned dates of publication.)
To the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Labour Market and Households Division (LMHD)
Scheduled delivery date for file: 20 October 2023.
Achieved delivery date for file: 20 October 2023.
Time lag between achieved delivery date and the end of the reference period: 12 days.
Data file for other users
Scheduled availability date for regional public and government normal release user files: 13 February 2024
Recipients
- Bank of England
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (to be superseded by Department for Business and Trade)
- Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
- Department for Education
- Department for Enterprise, Trade and Investment (Northern Ireland)
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport
- Department for Transport
- Department for Work and Pensions
- Department of Finance and Personnel (Northern Ireland)
- Economic and Social Research Council and Data Archive
- Health and Safety Executive
- HM Treasury
- Home Office
- Low Pay Commission
- Office for Standards in Education
- Office of Manpower Economics
- Scottish Government and Scottish Executive
- Small Business Service
- Welsh Government
6. Accessibility and clarity
(Accessibility is the ease with which users are able to access the data, also reflecting the format(s) in which the data are available and the availability of supporting information. Clarity refers to the quality and sufficiency of the metadata, illustrations and accompanying advice.)
The UK Data Archive at the University of Essex provides free access to the various Labour Force Survey (LFS) datasets.
The National Online Manpower Information System (NOMIS) provide a free but highly disaggregated dataset, which covers a wealth of data for local areas.
Our Social Surveys Team provide LFS data for a fee and can be contacted by phone on +44 1633 455678 or by email atsocialsurveys@ons.gov.uk.
Labour market data, including data from the LFS, are published every month through statistical bulletins. These include text, tables, and charts. Data contained within the bulletins are available to download, free of charge.
Because of recent quality concerns with LFS data, the ONS has paused the release of microdata through the channels listed in this section. Users will be updated in December 2023.
For questions relating to labour market statistics, please contact labour.market@ons.gov.uk.
For general queries about the LFS, please contact lfs@ons.gov.uk.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys7. Comparability
(Comparability is the degree to which data can be compared over time and domain.)
Background
The Labour Force Survey (LFS) began in 1973 and was carried out every two years until 1983. Between 1984 and 1991, data were collected annually, and the survey has been running in its present form, with quarterly sampling, since spring 1992.
During the UK's membership of the European Union, the survey was carried out under European Union regulations, which specified the way the survey should be conducted, the quality of the results that member states supply to Eurostat and the timetable for supplying results. Since the UK's exit from the European Union, these regulations do not apply anymore. Although the LFS began as a survey designed to meet international obligations, its primary purpose is now "the prompt publication of key aggregate, whole economy, indicators, for the integrated assessment of labour market conditions" (Review of the Labour Force Survey, Office for National Statistics, 2002).
Definitions
The definitions of the three economic activity groups – employed, unemployed and economically inactive – that are used in the LFS are the standard International Labour Organization (ILO) definitions.
Economically active
Those aged 16 years and over, who are either employed or unemployed in the survey reference week.
Employed
Those aged 16 years and over, who are regarded as in employment if they did at least one hour of work in the reference week (as an employee, self-employed, unpaid workers in a family business or participants in government-supported training schemes) and those who had a job that they were temporarily away from (for example, if they were on holiday).
Unemployed
Those aged 16 years and over, who are without work, want a job, have actively sought work in the last four weeks and are available to start work in the next two weeks, or are out of work but have found a job and are waiting to start it within the next two weeks.
Economically inactive
Those who are neither in employment nor unemployed. This group includes, for example, all those who are looking after a home or family, have a long-term illness or disability that prevents them working, or are retired.
Unpaid family workers
Those who are doing unpaid work in a family business.
July to September 2023 questionnaire changes
Deleted questions: CORO12M.
Amended questions: not applicable.
Please see User Guide Volume 2 and 3 2022 for further details.
Fieldwork and operational changes
A timeline of significant operational changes that may have had an impact on response include:
- July 2010 – households with residents aged 75 years and over are removed after their initial interview from October to December 2010 (OD10); this affects response rates, as these households generally have high response rates; see the "Questionnaire changes" section for more details
- January 2011 – a proportion of initial interviews were conducted by the telephone unit rather than face-to-face as an efficiency measure
- June 2017 – introduction of £5 and £10 incentives randomly allocated across the sample
- January 2018 – from January to March 2018 (JM18) onwards all initial interviews have been face-to-face, except for respondents north of the Caledonian Canal (NOCC)
- January 2018 – around 10% to 15% of the wave 1 sample moved from telephone operations to face-to-face
- April 2018 – introduction of new administrative systems for recording field time and expenses
- June 2018 – changes to advance materials and procedures because of the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation
- July 2018 – change of incentive type from a paper voucher to a card voucher
- October 2018 – launch of a new fieldwork management tool for use in face-to-face mode
- March 2019 – issues with the telephone system used for some cases in waves 2 to 5 resulted in poor connectivity, that may affect response rates
- March 2020 – social distancing measures were implemented in the UK; face-to-face data collection paused, and all interviewing moved to telephone mode
- May 2020 – unconditional incentive increased to £10 for all wave 1 households in Great Britain
- July 2020 – wave 1 LFS sample size doubled to account for lower response rates
- July 2020 – Northern Ireland moved from unconditional to conditional incentives for waves 1, 2 and 5 and increased the amount from £10 to £20 in wave 1
- April 2021 – wave 1 sample reduced to 160%; knock-to-nudge introduced
- October 2021 – wave 1 sample reduced to 150% of pre-coronavirus level
- April 2022 – wave 1 sample increased to 155% of pre-coronavirus level
- November 2022 – roll out of knock-to-nudge for the transformed LFS parallel run, affecting capacity being stretched in the field
- November to December 2022 – Royal Mail strikes resulted in advance letters to respondents being delivered late
- July 2023 – wave 1 sample reduced to the pre-coronavirus pandemic level
Survey methodology changes
Changes to State Pension age were introduced in 2010, that affected labour market and LFS publications as well as other social surveys. Under the Pensions Act 2011, the State Pension age of women was expected to increase more quickly (than originally planned) to aged 65 years between April 2016 and November 2018. From December 2018, the State Pension age for both men and women started to increase, expected to reach age 67 years by 2028.
From July to September 2010 (JS10), households that only contain respondents aged 75 years and over are removed from the sample after their wave 1 interview. This change was introduced to reduce the cost of the survey and reduce the burden on respondents. Households only containing individuals aged 75 years and over are largely economically inactive. Therefore, the value of interviewing these households is greatly reduced when considering the main aims of the LFS. The wave 1 interviews from aged 75 years and over households will receive a larger weight to make them representative of the UK population. This change results in around a 10% reduction in the household sample size and a 7% reduction in the individual sample size.
From JS10, the treatment of "concealed multi-households" on the LFS has also changed. Previously, if one sampled address turned out on inspection to be, for example, not one house but six flats, all six flats would be recorded as households and interviews would be attempted with each household. The number of households encountered could be in the hundreds. This would not be a practical approach. We decided to harmonise the approach to multi-households across all our social surveys. From JS10, if a concealed multi-household is recorded, only one household will be randomly selected to be interviewed.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys8. Coherence
(Coherence is the degree to which data that are derived from different sources or methods, but that refer to the same phenomenon, are similar.)
Data sources
The Labour Force Survey (LFS) is one of several sources of data about the labour market. Some sources provide data that overlap with LFS data on employment, unemployment and earnings. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has published guidance about the strengths and limitations of each source in relation to these topics and has indicated which source is the most appropriate for different purposes. Details can be found in our Labour market statistics guide.
Employment, unemployment and economic inactivity
The LFS is the source recommended by the ONS for certain employment-related statistics (for example, estimates of the number of people in employment or unemployed). The LFS is also a unique source of comprehensive, coherent information about economic inactivity, where it provides information separately about people who want a job and those who do not.
Number and industrial composition of jobs
The workforce jobs (WFJ) series provides estimates of the number of jobs in the UK economy and is the source recommended by the ONS for both the number of jobs and the industrial composition of jobs. Workforce jobs consist of the sum of employee jobs, self-employment jobs, jobs in the armed forces and government-supported trainees. Civilian workforce jobs are available by geographical region, sex and broad industry. Total workforce jobs are available by sex and broad industry.
Earnings
For estimates of change in earnings (for example, pay growth in the economy), a non-LFS source, the Average Weekly Earnings (AWE) measure (formerly the Average Earnings Index (AEI)), is the most suitable source. It provides industry and whole-economy information but excludes small employers, the self-employed and government-supported trainees. Pay, commission, bonuses, overtime and pay award arrears are included, but redundancy payments and benefits in kind are excluded.
The Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) includes information about the levels, distribution, and make-up of earnings and hours worked for employees in different occupations, industries, ages and regions. It should be used when the information required is not available from the AWE (such as for occupational groups, or regional analyses) and is the preferred source of the earnings of full-time employees and of the average hourly earnings of all employees. The LFS should be used when the information is not available from the AWE or from the ASHE and is the preferred source of data about the earnings of part-time and low-paid employees. There is an ONS guide to sources of data on earnings and income.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys9. Summary of methods
The Labour Force Survey (LFS) covers private households, including persons who are temporarily absent. The resident population is made up of persons who regard the sample address as their main address and those who have lived in the dwelling for more than six consecutive months, even if they do not regard this as their principal dwelling. Persons absent for more than six months are not regarded as members of the resident population.
A private household comprises of one or more persons (not necessarily related) living at the same address who share cooking facilities and share a living room, sitting room or dining area. Students living in halls of residence and pupils at boarding schools are sampled through the private households of their parents. In Great Britain, an additional sample is drawn from persons living in NHS accommodation.
The year is divided into quarters of 13 weeks. Before January 2006, these were seasonal quarters:
- winter (December to February)
- spring (March to May)
- summer (June to August)
- autumn (September to November)
From January 2006, the LFS has been conducted based on calendar quarters:
- Quarter 1 – January to March
- Quarter 2 – April to June
- Quarter 3 – July to September
- Quarter 4 – October to December
For most of Great Britain, the survey base is the Royal Mail's Postcode Address File (PAF), a database of all addresses receiving mail. The list is limited to addresses receiving fewer than 25 items of post per day, to exclude businesses. Because of the very low population density in the far north of Scotland (north of the Caledonian Canal), telephone directories are used as sampling frames. Interviews in the far north of Scotland are also carried out by telephone because face-to-face interviews would be too expensive. In Northern Ireland POINTER, which is the government's central register of domestic properties, is used.
In Great Britain, a systematic sample is drawn each quarter from the three sampling bases, yielding 16,640 PAF addresses, 75 telephone numbers for the north of Scotland and 36 units of NHS housing. As the PAF is broken down geographically, the systematic sampling ensures that the sample is representative at regional level. In Northern Ireland, a simple random sample is drawn, each quarter, from each of three strata, giving 650 addresses in all.
A rotation system made up of five waves is used. Respondents are interviewed five times at 13-week intervals and one-fifth of the sample is replaced each quarter. Interviews are usually carried out on a face-to-face (CAPI) or telephone (CATI) basis with the help of portable computers for the interviews in the first wave. In the far north of Scotland (north of the Caledonian Canal) and for interviews in the second to fifth waves, wherever possible, interviews are carried out by telephone. Some changes have been made to fieldwork operations, see “Fieldwork and Operational Changes” in Section 7: Comparability.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys10. Technical definitions
Imputation
If a household (or someone within a household) is unavailable for interview but was interviewed in the previous wave, responses from the previous wave are rolled forward. This is referred to as "imputation". Imputation is carried out to minimise non-response bias in estimates while simultaneously improving precision by boosting the sample size. The rationale is that most Labour Force Survey (LFS) variables do not change from one quarter to another for most people.
Responses are rolled forward for one wave only. Data are not rolled forward after a second consecutive non- response. Tables and charts (at person or household level) containing responses that have been rolled forward from the previous wave are denoted by the term "including imputed". Tables and charts that do not contain responses that have been rolled forward from the previous wave are denoted by the term "excluding imputed".
Method of calculating sampling variability
See Section 2: Summary of quality for information on the method of calculating sampling variability.
Method of calculating response rates
The response rate indicates how many interviews were achieved as a proportion of those eligible for the survey. The formula used is as follows:
RR equals (FR plus PR) divided by (FR plus PR plus OR plus CR plus RHQ plus NC plus RRI*).
Where RR is response rate, FR is full response, PR is partial response, OR is outright refusal, CR is circumstantial refusal, RHQ is refusal to HQ, NC is non-contact, RRI is refusal to re-interview, and the asterisk (*) applies to waves 2 to 5 only.
Definitions of response outcome categories
Full response
A household in which each household member has answered all applicable questions.
Partial response
A household in which questions were not completed because someone refused to be interviewed, refused part way through the questionnaire, or refused to let someone else answer on his or her behalf. However, at least one question block must have been completed. If only part of the information has been collected for a one-person household, it is coded as a refusal or non-contact.
Outright refusal
A household that refuses to respond to the survey and the interviewer feels that there is no chance of an interview at the current or in any future wave.
Circumstantial refusal
A household where the respondent refuses to respond because of a temporary circumstance (for example, going on holiday or being too busy during the field period). A circumstantial refusal enables an interviewer to call back at the next wave.
Refusal to HQ
A household that contacts headquarters to refuse to participate in the survey in response to the advance letter.
Non-contact
When an address is occupied, but where it has not been possible to contact any member of the household in the field period.
Refusal to re-interview
A household that takes part in the survey (at one or more of waves 1 to 4) but that, when asked to take part in the next wave (waves 2 to 5), refuses.
Method of calculating income response rates
The income question is asked at waves 1 and 5 only. Individuals aged 16 to 69 years, who are in employment in the reference week, form the sub-set of respondents who are eligible for these questions. The percentage response rates for the income questions are based on all eligible, in-scope respondents at wave 1 and all eligible, in-scope respondents at wave 5. The total response rate is the aggregate response rate for income for the quarter (wave 1 and wave 5), based on all eligible, in-scope respondents.
NS-SEC
NS-SEC is the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification, which replaces previous classifications that were based on social class and social and economic group.
Standard Occupational Classification
An issue was identified with some occupational data on a number of Office for National Statistics (ONS) surveys, including the LFS. This was caused by the implementation of the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) from SOC 2010 to SOC 2020. A full public statement on the impact of SOC miscoding, including a list of affected variables, was published on 26 September 2022. The article includes a link to the list of four-digit SOC codes and their estimated impact level.
The issue affects all LFS and Annual Population Survey (APS) datasets from January 2021 to September 2022. In October 2022, a revised SOC 2020 coding frame was introduced, correcting the error for collecting new data from that point.
Proxy response
The LFS has to complete fieldwork to a tight timetable, and interview as many of the sampled households as possible, which leaves limited time for recalls. LFS interviewers try to interview every adult (aged 16 years and over) in each sampled household. However, when a household member is unavailable for interview, interviewers accept information by proxy from another responsible adult in the household. The proxy respondents are normally people living with a partner on behalf of their partner, and parents on behalf of their adult offspring who live with them.
Attrition
Attrition is the term applied to respondents who begin the survey but subsequently drop out. It has been known for some time that these respondents tend to have different characteristics to those who remain in all waves of the survey, that can, therefore, result in attrition bias. For example, if respondents in a particular age group have a higher tendency to drop out (attrition rate) than respondents in other age groups, then they will be under-represented in subsequent waves of the survey and in estimates.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys12. Cite this article
Office for National Statistics (ONS), released 14 November 2023, ONS website, article, Labour Force Survey performance and quality monitoring report: July to September 2023