1. Key findings
'Cost’ was the most common barrier to transport in all transport types1 regardless of an adult’s impairment status. The proportion reporting ‘cost’ as a barrier was highest for taxis/minicabs and lowest for local buses
A higher percentage of adults reported ‘cost’ as a barrier to using motor vehicles in Wave Two only than in Wave One only. This finding was not seen for other transport types and coincided with a rise in the cost of fuel and car insurance2
For adults with impairment at both waves there is evidence that some perceived their impairment to have affected their ability to access all four transport types. This was not the case for the other analysis groups
Specific barrier types tended to be reported by adults at either Wave One only or Wave Two only, rather than at both waves. This suggests that barriers are transient in most cases, rather than fixed
Notes
The four transport types included in this chapter are: motor vehicles, local buses, long-distance trains and taxis/minicabs
Data source: Consumer Price Indices, January 2014 Office for National Statistics
2. Aims of this chapter
As we saw in Chapter 2 adults in the LOS can be classified into four groups for analysis:
adults with impairment at both waves
offset adults
onset-acquired adults
adults without impairment at both waves
These groups reflect the diversity of impairment status, in that impairment status may be stable, or may change over time. A person may have impairments at both waves (group 1) or no impairment at both waves (group 4), or they may no longer have impairments (group 2) or they acquire an impairments at Wave Two (group 3).
Chapter 2 of this report explored changes in participation restriction experienced between Wave One and Wave Two. According to the LOS definition, adults who had a participation restriction in one or more life area will experience barriers. Barriers to transport vary between transport types1; for example, ‘cost’ is a possible barrier to all transport types, whereas ‘parking problems’ only applies to motor vehicles. The barriers reported by adults may change over time. For each life area, it is also possible to see if a barrier was:
i. reported at both waves
ii. reported at Wave One only
iii. reported at Wave Two only
iv. not reported at either wave
This chapter describes the types of barriers to transport experienced by working age (16 to 64) adults, who had a participation restriction at any point in the survey. For these adults the types of barriers that were reported at both waves or at either wave (groups i, ii, and iii) will be examined by group. Four transport types are analysed separately in this chapter: motor vehicles, local buses, long-distance trains and taxis/minicabs.
Notes for 5.2 Aims of this chapter
- The four transport types included in this chapter are: motor vehicles, local buses, long-distance trains and taxis/minicabs
3. Types of barriers to using motor vehicles
This section describes the types of barriers experienced by working age adults (16 to 64) who had a participation restriction to using a motor vehicle1 at any point in the survey (as identified by the dark sections of the pie charts (see Figure 5.1). For these adults the types of barriers that were reported at both waves or at either wave (groups i, ii, and iii2) will be examined by group.
Figure 5.1 Percentage of working age (16 to 64) adults with a participation restriction to using motor vehicles1, by group2
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using motor vehicles at either or both waves
Source: Life Opportunities Survey - Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- An adult had a participation restriction to using a motor vehicle if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked
- Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report
- Sample sizes have been rounded independently to the nearest 10
- All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1
- Based on weighted data
The tables presented in this chapter show the top four barriers that were reported by each group, at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. The percentages reflect those who reported each barrier, out of those adults from that particular group who had a barrier to using motor vehicles at either or both waves.
Across all groups ‘cost’ was the most common barrier reported to using motor vehicles at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. ‘Parking problems’ was also among the four highest ranking barriers across all groups.
For all groups, ‘cost’ was more frequently reported at Wave Two only than at Wave One only. This has coincided with above-inflation rises in fuel and car insurance costs over the period covered by the two waves of the survey3. This pattern was not seen for other transport types.
For adults with impairment at both waves and onset-acquired adults there is evidence that some perceived their impairment to have restricted their use of a motor vehicle. At both and either wave, ‘a health condition, illness or impairment’ and ‘a disability’ were commonly reported barriers, by adults with impairments at both waves. Similarly, onset-acquired adults also commonly reported ‘a health condition, illness or impairment’ at Wave Two only, but not at Wave One only or both waves. This finding was not seen for other transport types.
In addition, ‘too busy/not enough time’ and ‘vehicle not available when needed’ tended to be featured in the top four ranking barriers for offset adults, onset-acquired adults and adults without impairment at both waves.
Table 5.1, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using motor vehicles at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 21 | Cost | 16 | Cost | 28 |
2 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 9 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 12 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 15 |
3 | A disability | 6 | Parking problems | 7 | A disability | 10 |
4 | Parking problems | 3 | A disability | 7 | Parking problems | 7 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using motor vehicles if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 740 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.1, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.2, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using motor vehicles at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 15 | Cost | 25 | Cost | 29 |
2 | Too busy/not enough time | 2 | Vehicle not available when needed | 9 | Too busy/not enough time | 10 |
3 | Parking problems | 2 | Too busy/not enough time | 8 | Caring responsibilities | 6 |
4 | Vehicle not available when needed | 2 | Parking problems | 8 | Vehicle not available when needed | 5 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using motor vehicles if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 300 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.2, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (28.2 kB)
Table 5.3, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using motor vehicles at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 19 | Cost | 18 | Cost | 38 |
2 | Too busy/not enough time | 3 | Vehicle not available when needed | 6 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 11 |
3 | Parking problems | 3 | Too busy/not enough time | 6 | Parking problems | 8 |
4 | n/a | n/a | Parking problems | 3 | Vehicle not available when needed | 8 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Note: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using motor vehicles if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 200 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. n/a - not applicable; there were no other barriers reported by 0.5% or over | ||||||
5. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
6. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.3, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (28.2 kB)
Table 5.4, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using motor vehicles at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 11 | Cost | 16 | Cost | 26 |
2 | Too busy/not enough time | 2 | Too busy/not enough time | 8 | Too busy/not enough time | 10 |
3 | Vehicle not available when needed | 2 | Vehicle not available when needed | 6 | Vehicle not available when needed | 8 |
4 | Parking problems | 1 | Parking problems | 5 | Parking problems | 6 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using motor vehicles if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 790 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.4, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using motor vehicles[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)Details of all barriers types can be found in the data section of this publication. The data can also be viewed as interactive charts.
Notes for 5.3 Types of barriers to using motor vehicles
An adult had a participation restriction to using a motor vehicle if they had continuous use of a motor vehicle, but did not go out in it as much as they would have liked
Section 5.2 aims of this chapter provides more details
Data source: Consumer Price Indices, January 2014 Office for National Statistics
4. Types of barriers to using local buses
This section describes the types of barriers experienced by working age adults (16 to 64) who had a participation restriction to using local buses1 at any point in the survey (as identified by the dark sections of the pie charts (see Figure 5.2)). For these adults the types of barriers that were reported at both waves or at either wave (groups i, ii, and iii2) will be examined by group.
Figure 5.2 Percentage of working age (16 to 64) adults with a participation restriction to using local buses1, by group2
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using local buses at either or both waves
Source: Life Opportunities Survey - Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- An adult had a participation restriction to using local buses if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months
- Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report
- Sample sizes have been rounded independently to the nearest 10
- All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1
- Based on weighted data
The tables presented in this chapter show the top four barriers that were reported by each group, at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. The percentages reflect those who reported each barrier, out of those adults from that particular group who had a barrier to using local buses at either or both waves.
‘Cost’ was the most reported barrier at Wave One only and Wave Two only for all four groups. At both waves, however, ‘transport unavailable’ was the most reported barrier by offset adults, adults without impairment at both waves and onset-acquired adults. A smaller percentage reported ‘cost’ as a barrier to local buses across all groups than for other transport types. This is unsurprising due to the comparatively low cost of travel by local bus, compared with motor vehicles, long-distance trains and taxis/minicabs.
Offset adults, onset-acquired adults and adults without impairment at both waves reported similar common barriers at Wave One only and Wave Two only. The four most common barriers were ‘cost’, ‘transport unavailable’, ‘too busy/not enough time’ and ‘delay and disruption to the service’. Adults with impairment at both waves reported similar common barriers to other groups, but also reported ‘a health condition, illness or impairment’ and ‘a disability’ as barriers to local buses, suggesting some perceived their impairment to be a barrier to using local buses.
Table 5.5, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using local buses at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 8 | Cost | 15 | Cost | 15 |
2 | Cost | 8 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 13 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 12 |
3 | A disability | 6 | Transport unavailable | 10 | A disability | 11 |
4 | Transport unavailable | 5 | A disability | 10 | Transport unavailable | 8 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using local buses if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 1,280 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.5, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.6, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using local buses at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Transport unavailable | 7 | Cost | 20 | Cost | 13 |
2 | Cost | 5 | Transport unavailable | 15 | Transport unavailable | 10 |
3 | Delay and disruption to service | 2 | Too busy/not enough time | 11 | Delay and disruption to service | 7 |
4 | Lack of information | 2 | Delay and disruption to service | 11 | Too busy/not enough time | 6 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Note: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using local buses if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 550 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.6, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.7, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using local buses at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Transport unavailable | 11 | Cost | 20 | Cost | 13 |
2 | Cost | 10 | Too busy/not enough time | 12 | Too busy/not enough time | 11 |
3 | Too busy/not enough time | 2 | Transport unavailable | 11 | Delay and disruption to service | 10 |
4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 2 | Delay and disruption to service | 9 | Transport unavailable | 10 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using local buses if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 340 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.7, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.8, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using local buses at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Transport unavailable | 9 | Transport unavailable | 15 | Cost | 16 |
2 | Cost | 6 | Cost | 14 | Transport unavailable | 13 |
3 | Too busy/not enough time | 2 | Too busy/not enough time | 10 | Delay and disruption to service | 9 |
4 | Delay and disruption to service | 2 | Delay and disruption to service | 9 | Too busy/not enough time | 7 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using local buses if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 1,500 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.8, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using local buses[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)Details of all barriers types can be found in the data section of this publication. The data can also be viewed as interactive charts.
Notes for 5.4 Types of barriers to using local buses
An adult had a participation restriction to using a local bus if they had not used local buses as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months
Section 5.2 aims of this chapter provides more details
5. Types of barriers to using long-distance trains
This section describes the types of barriers experienced by working age adults (16 to 64) who had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains1 at any point in the survey (as identified by the dark sections of the pie charts (see Figure 5.3)). For these adults the types of barriers that were reported at both waves or at either wave (groups i, ii, and iii2) will be examined by group.
Figure 5.3 Percentage of working age (16 to 64) adults with a participation restriction to long-distance trains1, by group2
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using long-distance trains at either or both waves
Source: Life Opportunities Survey - Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- An adult had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months
- Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report
- Sample sizes have been rounded independently to the nearest 10
- All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1
- Based on weighted data
The tables presented in this chapter show the top four barriers that were reported by each group, at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. The percentages reflect those who reported each barrier, out of those adults from that particular group who had a barrier to using long-distance trains at either or both waves.
Across all groups ‘cost’ was the most common barrier reported to long-distance trains at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. This is against a backdrop of above-inflation rises in the cost of train travel every year since 20043.
There is evidence to show that some adults with impairment at both waves perceived their impairment restricted their use of long-distance trains, whereas this was not the case for onset-acquired and offset adults. This may be due to the number and stability of impairment(s) reported by the impairment at both waves group. Adults with impairment at both waves commonly reported ‘a health condition, illness or impairment’ and ‘a disability’ at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves, while other groups tended to report ‘too busy/not enough time’, ‘delay and disruption to service’ and ‘transport unavailable’.
Table 5.9, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using long-distance trains at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 15 | Cost | 24 | Cost | 23 |
2 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 4 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 13 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 11 |
3 | A disability | 4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 9 | A disability | 9 |
4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 4 | A disability | 8 | Difficulty getting to stop or station | 7 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 1,260 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.9, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.10, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using long-distance trains at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 15 | Cost | 32 | Cost | 25 |
2 | Transport unavailable | 2 | Too busy/not enough time | 7 | Transport unavailable | 7 |
3 | Too busy/not enough time | 1 | Delay and disruption to service | 6 | Too busy/not enough time | 5 |
4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 1 | Transport unavailable | 5 | Overcrowding | 3 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 560 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.10, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.11, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using long-distance trains at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 11 | Cost | 35 | Cost | 32 |
2 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 2 | Transport unavailable | 7 | Overcrowding | 6 |
3 | Delay and disruption to service | 1 | Too busy/not enough time | 4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 5 |
4 | Difficulty getting to stop or station | 1 | Overcrowding | 3 | Transport unavailable | 5 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 330 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.11, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.12, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using long-distance trains at either or both waves3 | ||||||||
Great Britain | ||||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % | ||
1 | Cost | 11 | Cost | 36 | Cost | 26 | ||
2 | Transport unavailable | 1 | Delay and disruption to service | 6 | Transport unavailable | 5 | ||
3 | Overcrowding | 1 | Too busy/not enough time | 6 | Too busy/not enough time | 4 | ||
4 | Too busy/not enough time | 1 | Overcrowding | 6 | Overcrowding | 3 | ||
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||||
Notes: | ||||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using long-distance trains if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 1,320 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.12, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using long-distance trains[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (28.2 kB)Details of all barriers types can be found in the data section of this publication. The data can also be viewed as interactive charts.
Notes for 5.5 Types of barriers to using long-distance trains
An adult had a participation restriction to using a long-distance train if they had not used long-distance trains as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months
Section 5.2 aims of this chapter provides more details
Data source: Consumer Price Indices, January 2014 Office for National Statistics
6. Types of barriers to using taxis/minicabs
This section describes the types of barriers experienced by working age adults (16 to 64) who had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs1 at any point in the survey (as identified by the dark sections of the pie charts (see Figure 5.4)). For these adults the types of barriers that were reported at both waves or at either wave (groups i, ii, and iii ) will be examined by group.
Figure 5.4 Percentage of working age (16 to 64) adults with a participation restriction to taxis/minicabs1, by group2
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves
Source: Life Opportunities Survey - Office for National Statistics
Notes:
- An adult had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs if they had not used taxis/minicabs as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months
- Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report
- Sample sizes have been rounded independently to the nearest 10
- All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1
- Based on weighted data
The tables presented in this chapter show the top four barriers that were reported by each group, at Wave One only, Wave Two only and both waves. The percentages reflect those who reported each barrier, out of those adults from that particular group who had a barrier to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves.
As in other transport types, ‘cost’ was the most common barrier reported to using taxis/minicabs for all the groups, at both waves, and at Wave One. A higher proportion of adults with barriers to taxis/minicabs reported ‘cost’ as a barrier than for other transport types.
The second most common barrier reported by adults with impairment at both waves was ‘a health condition, illness or impairment’ and ‘a disability’, whereas other groups did not report this barrier. This suggests, as in other transport types, that some adults with impairment at both waves perceived their impairment to be a barrier to using taxis/minicabs, whereas this is not found in the offset or onset-acquired groups.
Table 5.13, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves3 | ||||||||
Great Britain | ||||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % | ||
1 | Cost | 26 | Cost | 31 | Cost | 34 | ||
2 | A disability | 1 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 6 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 4 | ||
3 | A health condition, illness or impairment | 1 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 4 | A disability | 3 | ||
4 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 1 | A disability | 4 | Difficulty getting in or out of the transport | 3 | ||
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||||
Notes: | ||||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs if they had not used taxis/minicabs as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 1,010 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||||
4. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||||
5. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.13, Adults with impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.14, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 21 | Cost | 38 | Cost | 33 |
2 | n/a | n/a | Transport unavailable | 2 | Transport unavailable | 3 |
3 | n/a | n/a | Attitudes of staff | 1 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 2 |
4 | n/a | n/a | A health condition, illness or impairment | 1 | Difficulty getting in or out of the transport | 1 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs if they had not used taxis/minicabs as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 440 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. n/a - not applicable; there were no other barriers reported by 0.5% or over | ||||||
5. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
6. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.14, Offset adults[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (28.2 kB)
Table 5.15, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 16 | Cost | 38 | Cost | 41 |
2 | n/a | n/a | Attitudes of staff | 1 | Transport unavailable | 3 |
3 | n/a | n/a | Transport unavailable | 1 | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 2 |
4 | n/a | n/a | Anxiety/lack of confidence | 1 | Difficulty getting in or out of the transport | 1 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs if they had not used taxis/minicabs as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 280 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. n/a - not applicable; there were no other barriers reported by 0.5% or over | ||||||
5. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
6. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.15, Onset-acquired adults[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (27.6 kB)
Table 5.16, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
Adults aged between 16 and 64, who experienced a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs at either or both waves3 | ||||||
Great Britain | ||||||
Rank | Barrier at both waves | % | Barrier at Wave One only | % | Barrier at Wave Two only | % |
1 | Cost | 21 | Cost | 33 | Cost | 40 |
2 | n/a | n/a | Transport unavailable | 2 | Transport unavailable | 1 |
3 | n/a | n/a | Attitudes of staff | 1 | Too busy/not enough time | 1 |
4 | n/a | n/a | Overcrowding | 1 | Fear of crime | 1 |
Source: Life Opportunities Survey Wave Two Longitudinal Dataset, Office for National Statistics | ||||||
Notes: | ||||||
1. Please refer to definition of longitudinal analysis groups in the Introduction of Life Opportunities Survey - Understanding disability Wave Two Part II report | ||||||
2. An adult had a participation restriction to using taxis/minicabs if they had not used taxis/minicabs as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months | ||||||
3. Based on weighted data and a sample size of 950 (the unweighted sample figure has been rounded to the nearest 10) | ||||||
4. n/a - not applicable; there were no other barriers reported by 0.5% or over | ||||||
5. Please see reference tables for data for all barriers | ||||||
6. All percentages have been rounded to the nearest 1 |
Download this table Table 5.16, Adults without impairment at both waves[1]: top four barriers to using taxis/minicabs[2], by experience of barrier
.xls (28.2 kB)Details of all barriers types can be found in the data section of this publication. The data can also be viewed as interactive charts.
Notes for 5.6 Types of barriers to using taxis/minicabs
- An adult had a participation restriction to using a taxi/minicab if they had not used a taxi/minicab as much as they would have liked to in the last 12 months