1. Main points

There were 726 homicides in the year ending March 2018, 20 more (3% increase) than in the previous year. However, recent trends in homicide are affected by the recording of exceptional incidents with multiple victims such as the terrorist attacks in London and Manchester, and events at Hillsborough in 1989. If these are excluded, then the number of homicides increased by 89, or 15%, from 606 to 695. The number of homicides was the highest since the year ending March 2008, when 729 were recorded.

There were 285 homicides where the method of killing was by a knife or sharp instrument, the highest number since the Home Office Homicide Index began in 1946.

The rise in homicide seen in recent years has been most pronounced in male victims and those in younger age groups.

There were 12 offences of homicide per million population, and the homicide rate for males (17 per million population) was just over double that for females (8 per million population).

As in previous years, women were far more likely than men to be killed by partners or ex-partners (33% of female victims compared with 1% of male victims), and men were more likely than women to be killed by friends or acquaintances (25% of male victims compared with 7% of female victims).

Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

2. How is homicide defined and measured?

The term “homicide” covers the offences of murder, manslaughter and infanticide1. Murder and manslaughter are common law offences that have never been defined by statute, although they have been modified by statute. The manslaughter category includes the offence of corporate manslaughter which was created by the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 which came into force on 6 April 2008. The offence of infanticide was created by the Infanticide Act 1922 and refined by the Infanticide Act 1938 (section 1).

Data presented have been extracted from the Home Office Homicide Index which contains detailed record-level information about each homicide recorded by police in England and Wales. It is continually updated with revised information from the police and the courts and, as such, is a richer source of data than the main recorded crime dataset2 and is therefore the preferred source for homicide statistics. However, due to the level of detail of the information collected, the Homicide Index does not provide data that are as timely as the main police recorded crime return. More up-to-date headline figures are published as part of the quarterly ONS Crime Statistics in England and Wales series.

In accordance with the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007, statistics based on the Home Office Homicide Index have been re-assessed against the Code of Practice for Official Statistics and found to meet the required standard for designation as National Statistics3. Further information on the interpretation of recorded crime data is provided in the User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales.

Homicide Index data are based on the year when the offence was recorded as a crime, not when the offence took place or when the case was heard in court. While in the vast majority of cases the offence will be recorded in the same year as it took place, this is not always the case. Caution is therefore needed when looking at longer-term homicide trends. For example:

  • the 173 homicides attributed to Dr Harold Shipman4 as a result of Dame Janet Smith’s inquiry took place over a long period of time but were all recorded by the police during the year ending March 2003

  • the 96 deaths that occurred at Hillsborough in 1989 were recorded as manslaughters in the year ending March 2017 following the verdict of the Hillsborough Inquest in April 2016

Furthermore, where several people are killed by the same suspect, the number of homicides counted is the total number of victims killed rather than the number of incidents. For example, the victims of the Manchester Arena bombing in May 2017 are counted as 22 individual homicides, rather than one incident.

The data in this article refer to the position as at 4 December 2018, when the Homicide Index database was “frozen” for the purpose of analysis5. The data will change as subsequent court hearings take place or as further information is received.

The circumstances surrounding a homicide may be complex and it can take time for cases to pass through the criminal justice system (CJS). Due to this, the percentage of homicides recorded in the year ending March 2018 (and, to a lesser extent, those recorded in earlier years) that have concluded at Crown Court is likely to show an increase when the next figures from the Homicide Index are published6. Conversely, the proportion of cases without suspects or with court proceedings pending is expected to decrease. This is due to police completing more investigations and as cases pass through the CJS (see “What do we know about suspects” section for further details).

For the purposes of the Homicide Index, a suspect in a homicide case is defined as either:

  • a person who has been arrested in respect of an offence initially classified as homicide7 and charged with homicide, including those who were subsequently convicted

  • a person who is suspected by the police of having committed the offence but is known to have died or committed suicide prior to arrest or being charged

Where there are multiple suspects, they are categorised in the Homicide Index as either the principal or a secondary suspect. There is only ever one principal suspect per homicide victim. If there is any conviction information available then the suspect with the longest sentence or most serious conviction is determined to be the principal suspect. In the absence of any court outcome, the principal suspect is either the person considered by the police to be the most involved in the homicide or the suspect with the closest relationship to the victim.

As more than one person can be convicted for a single homicide, the number of people convicted will not necessarily be the same as the number of victims recorded.

Notes for: How is homicide defined and measured?

  1. Infanticide is defined as the killing of a baby under 1 year old by their mother while the balance of her mind was disturbed as a result of giving birth.

  2. For example, when the police initially record an offence as a homicide it remains classified as such unless the police or courts decide that a lesser offence, or no offence, took place. The offence would be reclassified on the Homicide Index as “no longer recorded” but may remain in the main police recorded crime collection as a homicide.

  3. The letter of confirmation can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website.

  4. In previous years, this figure has been incorrectly stated as 172.

  5. The Homicide Index is continually updated with revised information from the police as investigations continue and as cases are heard by the courts. The version used for analysis does not accept updates after it is “frozen to ensure the data do not change during the analysis period. See Section 3.1 of the user guide for more information.

  6. In the year ending March 2016 an exercise was carried out with the National Confidential Inquiry at the University of Manchester and Greater Manchester Police to update the Homicide Index with missing CJS outcomes. This led to a decrease in the number of homicides with pending/in progress cases, and a corresponding increase in final outcomes. This exercise was not carried out this year; therefore homicide cases for the year ending March 2017 and 2018 will have a higher number of pending/in progress cases.

  7. The homicide may no longer be recorded as such if all the suspects were acquitted.

Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

4. Which groups of people are most likely to be victims of homicide?


As in previous years, the majority of homicide victims in the year ending March 2018 were male (69%, 499 victims) and 31% were female (227 victims).

The number of male victims has increased at a faster rate than females in recent years. The figure of 499 male victims of homicide was an increase of 54% from 324 in the year ending March 2015. In contrast, the number of female homicide victims had remained broadly flat until increasing by 49 homicides (28%, excluding Hillsborough victims) in the year ending March 2018. (Figure 2).

The homicide rate for males (17 per million population) was around twice that for females (eight per million population), a pattern that is consistent with previous years (Appendix Table 3). However, it should be noted that the nature of homicides differs between men and women, as discussed in the “How are victims and suspects related?” section of this article.


The most common age-group for victims of homicides recorded in the year ending March 2018 was 16- to 24-year-olds (152 victims). This was closely followed by 25- to 34-year-olds (140 victims), and 35- to 44-year-olds (119 victims) and 45- to 54-year-olds (108 victims).

As in previous years, babies under the age of 1 had the highest rate of homicide (26 per million population), along with those aged 16 to 24 years (24 per million population).

Homicide victims aged 16- to 24 years and aged 25- to 34 years had the largest volume increases for the year ending March 2018 compared with the previous year. Victims aged 16- to 24 years increased by nearly a half (45%, 105 to 152, excluding Hillsborough victims). The number of homicides in this age group has been relatively flat over recent years (excluding Hillsborough victims), with the increase in the last year mainly seen among male victims. This, in part, reflects the increase in serious violence in London and other cities where young adults have been disproportionately affected. Victims aged 25- to 34 years increased by over a fifth (23%, 114 to 140); with increases seen among both male and female victims.

There were only two age categories that saw a fall amongst female victims; those aged 35- to 44 years decreased from 42 to 29, and those aged over 75 years decreased by from 24 to 22.

Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

6. What are the most common methods of killing?

As in previous years, the most common method of killing, for both male and female victims, was by a knife or other sharp instrument. There were 285 such homicides (39% of the total) recorded in the year ending March 2018 (Appendix Table 4). This was an increase of 73 (34%) compared with the previous year. Over the last decade, the proportion of offences committed by a sharp instrument has fluctuated between 35% and 40%1. For more information on sharp instrument homicides, see section 7. “Highest number of sharp instrument homicides seen in year ending March 2018”.

The second most common method of killing was “kicking or hitting”, accounting for 106 homicides (15% of the total), a slightly lower proportion than seen over the previous decade (around a fifth, 20%). As in previous years, the majority (87%) of victims killed in this way were male.

There were 29 homicide victims killed by shooting in the year ending March 2018, three fewer than the previous year. The number of homicides by shooting has fluctuated between 21 and 32 over the last six years. In the previous five years2, there were between 39 and 60 homicides by shooting a year and the number of these offences is 45% lower than a decade ago.

More detailed information on knife crime and offences involving a firearm can be found in the offences involving the use of weapons data tables.

Notes for: What are the most common methods of killing?

  1. The proportion was 35% in the year ending March 2017 if the Hillsborough manslaughters are excluded.

  2. The year ending March 2008 to the year ending March 2012.

Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

7. Highest number of sharp instrument homicides seen in year ending March 2018

As stated earlier, there were 285 knife and sharp instrument homicides recorded in the year ending March 2018, the highest number since the Home Office Homicide Index began in 1946. The previous high was in the year ending March 2008 when there were 268 homicide victims killed by knife or a sharp instrument.

There were increases in sharp instrument homicides for both male victims (from 161 to 222; up 38%) and female victims (from 51 to 63; up 24%). Male victims aged 16- to 24 years and 25- to 34 years saw the biggest increases over the last year, with victims aged 16- to 24 years increasing from 54 to 86 homicides, and victims aged 25- to 34 years increasing from 37 to 54 homicides. (Appendix Table 5)

The latest figures show just under two-thirds of sharp instrument homicide victims were White (63%, 179 homicides), while a further quarter (25%; 70 victims) were Black. This is both the highest number and proportion of Black victims of sharp instrument homicides since these data were first collected in the year ending March 1997. The previous highest was in the year ending March 2009, when there were 58 Black victims (23% of all sharp instrument homicides in that year, 256). Of these 70 homicides recorded in the last year:

  • 55 were recorded by the Metropolitan Police

  • In 80% (56) of the homicides, the location of the offence was a public place (compared with 44% of overall homicides)

Black men aged 16- to 24 years experienced the largest increase in sharp instrument homicides (78% increase, from 23 to 41 homicides).

There are likely to be important socio-economic factors in homicides that cannot be examined using Homicide Index data. There is evidence from other studies that suggests that ethnicity is just one of many factors in homicides and violent incidents in general. Leyland and Dundas (2009), for example, investigated Scottish homicides between 1980 and 2005, and concluded that “contextual influences of the neighbourhood of residence might be more important than individual characteristics in determining the victims of assault”.

The Serious Violence Strategy, published by the Government in 2018, states “the evidence on links between serious violence and ethnicity is limited. Once other factors are controlled for, it is not clear from the evidence whether ethnicity is a predictor of offending or victimisation”.1

The number of White victims was the highest since the year ending March 2008 (191 victims). There were large increases in sharp instrument homicides among White men aged 16 to 24 years (58% increase, from 19 to 30 homicides), and those aged 25- to 34 years (57% increase, from 21 to 33 homicides).

Notes for: Highest number of sharp instrument homicides seen in year ending March 2018

  1. Page 35, HM Government Serious Violence Strategy, April 2018
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

8. What do we know about the circumstances and location of homicides?

Circumstances of homicides

The latest figures show just over half (51%, 373 offences) of all homicide cases resulted from a quarrel, a revenge attack or a loss of temper. This is a similar proportion compared with the previous year (excluding Hillsborough victims). This proportion was higher where the principal suspect was known to the victim (67%), compared with when the suspect was unknown to the victim (40%). There was little difference between males and females. (Appendix Table 11)

Furtherance of theft or gain accounted for 6% of homicides (47 offences), and 3% of homicides (21 offences) occurred during irrational acts1. As at 4 December 2018, the apparent circumstances were not known for 22% of homicides (161 offences) recorded in the year ending March 2018 (Appendix Table 10). This figure is similar to the previous year and is likely to decrease as the police carry out further investigations.

Location of homicides

Female victims were most likely to be killed in or around a house or dwelling or residential home (77%, 174 offences for year ending March 2018). This compares with 40% of male homicides (200 offences). Around a third (32%) of male homicides took place in a street, path or alleyway (161 offences) compared with only 7% of female homicides (16 offences). These patterns reflect differing victim-suspect relationships presented in the section above (Appendix Table 12).

Notes for: What do we know about the circumstances and location of homicides?

  1. Homicides classified as irrational acts cover those offences where there is evidence that the offender was suffering substantial mental illness. These do not account for all homicides committed by mentally ill people, as offences with an apparent motive (for example, during a quarrel or robbery) are instead included under the respective circumstance. Higher overall totals for homicides committed by those suffering mentally illness are quoted elsewhere (National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness).
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

10. What do we know about suspects?

More than one suspect may be charged per homicide victim and in some cases no suspect is identified or charged (Table 1). Therefore, the number of suspects is not the same as the number of offences. The number of cases with no suspect is likely to decrease as the police continue their investigations.

Investigative and court outcomes

In total, there were 685 suspects as at 4 December 2018 relating to the 730 homicides initially recorded in the year ending March 2018 (Appendix Table 18). Of these, the majority were male (93%, 634 suspects), a similar proportion to previous years.

The 685 suspects had the following outcomes:

  • court proceedings were pending for 342 suspects (50%)

  • court proceedings had concluded for 322 suspects (47% of all suspects)

  • 19 suspects had committed suicide or died (3%)

  • the remaining two suspects had no proceedings taken on advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

In the three years from the year ending March 2016 to the year ending March 2018, 79% of suspects indicted for homicide with a court outcome were found guilty of homicide, 15% were acquitted, and 4% were convicted of a lesser offence (Appendix Table 19). Similar criminal justice statistics produced by the Ministry of Justice show that the conviction ratio (the number of convictions within a given period divided by the number of prosecutions in the same period) for homicide offences in the year ending March 2018 was 87%1.

The case outcomes for suspects of homicides recorded in the year ending March 2018 (Appendix Table 18) are likely to change as cases progress through the CJS and more information becomes available.

Age and sex of convicted suspects

As in previous years, the majority of suspects convicted of homicide were male (236; 94%). One-third (33%) of convicted male suspects were aged between 16 and 24 years old, with 26% being 25 to 34 years old and 21% being 35 to 44 years old. Female suspects tended to be older, with 10 of the 16 suspects convicted in the year ending March 2018 being 35 years or older (Appendix Table 21 and Figure 7).

Notes for: What do we know about suspects?

  1. Offenders found guilty in a given year may have been proceeded against in previous year. This series has fluctuated between 67% and 88% in the last decade.
Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

11. International homicide comparisons

There are issues surrounding the comparability of international homicide data1, therefore caution should be taken in comparing homicide rates across countries.

Eurostat2 figures show that police recorded intentional homicide offences consistently decreased across EU Member States from 2008 to 2014, before an increase in 2015 followed by a decrease in 2016 continuing the 2008 to 2014 trend.

The Scottish Government publish annual homicide figures, and the most recently published report showed the number of homicide cases recorded by the police in Scotland decreased by 5% in the year ending March 2018, from 62 to 59. Over the ten-year period from 2008 to 2009 to 2017 to 2018, the number of homicide cases in Scotland fell by 39% (38 cases) from 97 to 59.

The Police Service of Northern Ireland figures show that there were 27 homicide offences recorded by the police in Northern Ireland in the year ending March 2018, an increase of 10 offences compared with the previous year.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) publish a Global Homicide Handbook which gives a comprehensive overview of intentional homicide across the world. The most recent of these was published in 2014, and showed that the global average homicide rate stands at 62 per million population. Southern Africa and Central America had rates over four times higher than that (above 240 victims per million population). Meanwhile, with rates some five times lower than the global average, Eastern Asia, Southern Europe and Western Europe were the sub-regions with the lowest homicide rates.

The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation publish figures showing that the homicide rate in the United States of America in 2017 was 54 per million population.

Notes for: International homicide comparisons

  1. There are different definitions of homicide between countries, although definitions vary less than for some other types of crimes; differing points in criminal justice systems at which homicides are recorded, for instance, when the offence is discovered or following further investigation or court outcome; the figures are for completed homicides (that is excluding attempted murder) but, in some countries, the police register any death that cannot immediately be attributed to other causes as homicide.

  2. Eurostat is the statistical office of the European Union situated in Luxembourg. Its mission is to provide high quality statistics for Europe. While fulfilling its mission, Eurostat promotes the following values: respect and trust, fostering excellence, promoting innovation, service orientation, professional independence.

Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys

Manylion cyswllt ar gyfer y Erthygl

Meghan Elkin
Ffôn: +44 (0)20 7592 8695