The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has a programme of research and development aimed at improving and maintaining its range of consumer price inflation statistics – ensuring that they continue to meet user needs, make use of new and innovative methods and data sources, and follow international best practice.
The article, Measuring changing prices and costs for consumers and households, proposed updates: March 2020, sets out more detail on the “use cases” for each of our main inflation measures – the Consumer Prices Index including owner occupiers’ housing costs (CPIH), the Consumer Prices Index (CPI), the Household Costs Indices (HCIs), and the Retail Prices Index (RPI).Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys
The strategy for UK statistics, Statistics for the public good, which runs to April 2025, sets the collective mission for the official statistics system as, “High quality data and analysis to inform the UK, improve lives and build the future”, and is based on four pillars: radical, ambitious, inclusive and sustainable.
The development plan presented in this article reflects how consumer prices development work contributes to the strategy for the UK statistical system, through quality and relevant price statistics that are produced efficiently to meet customers’ needs, keeping pace with evolving methods, sources and digital processes.
Items on the development plan are prioritised through discussion at our Advisory Panels on Consumer Prices every September, and are assigned a high, medium or low priority. High priority items will be resourced as a priority, and we expect to make good progress in these areas. High priority work streams would only be stopped if it were necessary to ensure the publication of our main outputs.
Medium priority items will be pursued as resource allows; however, some medium priority work may be slowed down or stopped altogether to allow progress on high priority items to be made. Low priority items will only be taken forward where resource is available to do so, and this will not prevent high or medium priority workstreams from progressing.Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys
The work programme for consumer price statistics was first included in the 2015 consultation on consumer price statistics. The current work programme has since been updated to reflect the outcome of the review, and also to reflect decisions reached by the National Statistician following the consultation.
It has also been updated to reflect the views of the Advisory Panels on Consumer Prices following discussion by both the Technical and Stakeholder Panels every year between 2016 and 2020. The programme and priorities also reflect the priority placed on the use of alternative data sources by Professor Sir Charles Bean’s review of economic statistics (commonly referred to as the Bean Review).Nôl i'r tabl cynnwys
We are currently working through a comprehensive transformation programme for consumer price statistics in order to modernise their measurement and make better use of data and methods that are becoming increasingly available to us.
At a high level, this involves obtaining robust sources of alternative data, development of statistical systems to work with these data, and methodological research in order to effectively classify, validate and construct high quality price indices from new data sources. These new data sources will be used in conjunction with traditionally collected data to improve the accuracy, efficacy and representativity of consumer price inflation statistics.
The data sources that we are investigating are web-scraped data (automated data collection from retailer websites) and scanner data (point-of-sale expenditure and quantity data provided directly by retailers). More information can be found regarding these data sources in our article Introducing alternative data sources into consumer price statistics.
This transformation will be the largest change to consumer price statistics in a generation, and the scale and importance of this work should not be underestimated. We will be reliant on developments in many areas, including the use of new technology platforms and the willingness of retailers to provide us point-of-sale data. Because of the scale of this work, the project has been separated into its own work programme, to allow for more detail to be provided about the various work streams.
Our ambitious roadmap sets out our plans to incorporate alternative data sources into our headline measures of consumer price statistics in 2023. We plan to do this using a three-phased approach.
Phase 1 (Research: 2020) involves developing systems and methods for use with alternative data sources, alongside traditional sources and methods. As some of our work was diverted towards producing analyses in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, our research phase will now continue to Quarter 3 (July to Sept) 2021 in parallel with Phase 2 (application).
Phase 2 (Application: 2021) involves us applying different configurations of these methods to specific categories as prioritised with our Stakeholder Advisory Panel on Consumer Prices.
Phase 3 (Engagement: 2022) involves the release of quarterly experimental estimates of the impact of alternative data sources on consumer price statistics, as well as engagement with stakeholders and users about these changes.
The impact of the new data sources and methods will first be introduced in the published figures in the February 2023 UK consumer price statistics, published in March 2023.
High priority items are the cornerstone of the development programme and, if necessary, will be prioritised over the delivery of medium and low priority items.
The workstreams listed in the sections below summarise the research into new methods and systems that is required before we can process alternative data sources for the purposes of producing consumer price statistics in Quarter 1 (Jan to Mar) 2023. Where relevant, intermediate implementation dates are also included.
Developing a processing pipeline
The pipeline to produce consumer price indices using web scraped data is being built on our in-house distributed system - the Data Access Platform (DAP). The platform is based on a very powerful cluster of computers and provides the users with many software tools to store and analyse data. The pipeline is being designed using a suitable flexible framework that can be applied to all items and data sources in the future consumer basket.
Quarter 4 2020: Functionality of pipeline expanded to include locally collected data
Quarter 4 2021: Complete development of our IT system
Throughout 2022: Use processing pipeline for parallel run alongside existing production system
Development of online price changes Experimental Statistics (faster indicators)
In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and urgent stakeholder requirements, a timely measure of price changes was developed using experimental web scraped data and our prototype pipeline, first published in April 2020. This initially covered a basket of high-demand products, but has since been expanded to cover all food and drink items. While the majority of development has been completed for this new weekly production round, there remains some further systems work and also longer-term research in the alternative data sources project (such as classification) is also likely to feed into this project.
Quarter 4 2020: Final system built complete for faster indicators weekly publication
Quarter 2 2021: New methods incorporated into the faster indicators system
Expenditure weights for different data sources and retailers
This work will recommend methods and suitable data sources that will allow us to aggregate together alternative data sources with traditionally collected data. For example, traditionally collected data for bread from local bakeries alongside scanner data for loaves bought from large retailers. This will feed into the aggregation part of the processing pipeline. This work will also be an extension of the improvements to shop type weights introduced in Quarter 1 2020.
Quarter 2 2021: Final recommendations on expenditure weights for aggregation
Quarter 3 2021: Aggregation functions built in pipeline
Framework for assessing the quality of index number methods used for web scraped and scanner data in consumer price indices
The index number framework summarises the properties of a desirable index number method and provides recommendations on how a final index number method could be selected for different prioritised item categories, incorporating alternative data sources. The framework will be kept updated in line with international research and developments and recommendations from this work will feed into our final decision on which method (or methods) to choose for implementation.
Quarter 3 2021: External experts review of index number framework and recommended methods
Quarter 4 2021: Final recommendation on index number methods for each prioritised item category
The classification project looks at automatically classifying products to a specific item category. This work will recommend which methods are suitable for our prioritised item categories and for different data sources. This work will also include a review of existing item definitions, as some look to be too narrow for automatic classification techniques to work to a suitable level of accuracy (for example, the item definition for women’s blouses specifies whether the blouse should open fully, information that is not readily available in item descriptions scraped from retailer websites).
Quarter 1 2021: Case studies of different classification methods that are suitable for different types of product category and different data sources
Quarter 2 2021: Classification pipeline built
Quarter 4 2021: Final recommendation on classification methods for each prioritised item category
Expenditure weights for web-scraped data
One of the limitations of web-scraped data is that it does not provide information on expenditure or quantities of product bought. This work will identify if the lack of expenditure weights at the product level introduces any bias into any index based on web-scraped data, and if we can approximate expenditure weights using alternative data sources like page rankings.
Quarter 2 2021: Final recommendations due on if and how expenditure weights can be found for web scraped data at the product level
Quarter 4 2021: Final recommendation on expenditure weights for each prioritised item category, where applicable
In the current methodology, the price for an individual product is followed over time and compared back to the price of the same product in the base period. An alternative approach would be to follow the average price of a defined group of homogeneous products instead. Research has shown this to be a viable alternative for categories such as clothing which experience high rates of product churn over time. This will feed into how we define a unique product in the pipeline for identified categories.
Quarter 2 2021: Recommendations on different product grouping methods and what scenarios they should be used in
Quarter 3 2021: Product grouping pipeline built
Quarter 4 2021: Final recommendations due on whether product grouping methods should be used for each prioritised item category
The impact of product returns, discounts, product relaunches and units of measurement on alternative data sources
The issue of returns affecting expenditure weights for particular categories may have an impact on how we can use expenditure weights in a final item index.
Take-up rates from discounts observed in scanner datasets may be applied to web-scraped and traditionally collected data to ensure consistent treatment of discounts.
Product relaunches need to be identified to ensure that quality changes in products are captured and appropriately adjusted for over time.
Units of measurement (UoM) may be inconsistent for a product over time (for example, a product may have a UoM of 200 millilitres in one month and 0.22 litres in the next), units of measurement need to be standardised as much as possible to ensure any changes in product weight or size can be appropriately adjusted for.
Quarter 2 2021: Final recommendations on treatment of returns, discounts and product relaunches
Quarter 3 2021: Recommended methods built in pipeline
Using data elsewhere pre-2023
There are areas in the inflation basket that may benefit from the use of alternative data sources prior to our main implementation milestone in 2023. The hedonic modelling process for technological goods currently involves the use of hundreds of manually collected data to produce regression models. Web-scraping therefore has the potential to improve the efficacy of data collection for use in hedonic modelling, without feeding directly into the indices produced.
There are also some categories in the inflation basket where it may be appropriate to replace existing data collection procedures with web-scraping in-house. For example, we are developing a “robot tool” that sends an email to price collectors when a website changes. This may be useful in cases where we know prices to be relatively static, such as passport fees. We are also building more advanced web-scrapers to scale up our capability to web-scrape retailers’ websites. Since March 2020 we have been web-scraping a number of large UK retailer websites and these have been used in the production of weekly web-scraped price indices.
Quarter 4 2020: Parallel run advanced web-scrapers for motorbikes with live collection
Quarter 3 2021: Supplement hedonic collection “test data” with data from alternative data sources
Quarter 4 2021: Build and parallel testing of robot tool for items with relatively static pricing structures within the basket
Expanding pipeline functionality - outlier detection and imputation
Improvements need to be made to some of the existing functionalities within the current pipeline. For example, the current functionality uses very basic outlier detection methods (for example, minimum and maximum checks) and imputation approach (price carry-forward method).
Better methods need to be understood and developed, in line with international best practice in price indices and big data.
Quarter 2 2021: Recommendation of outlier detection methods for use with alternative data sources
Quarter 2 2021: Recommendation of imputation methods for use with alternative data sources
Quarter 3 2021: Recommended methods built in pipeline
5.1 High priority items
High priority items are the cornerstone of the development programme and, if necessary, will be prioritised over the delivery of medium and low priority items.
Developing Household Cost Indices (HCIs)
The concept of a Household Costs Index (HCI) was first proposed by Astin and Leyland (as the Household Inflation Index, HII), culminating in Towards a Household Inflation Index, which was submitted as a response to the 2015 consultation on consumer price statistics. Suggested differences from existing measures of price change include the potential inclusion of asset prices and interest payments, plus giving each household’s expenditure equal weight. Following the consultation, the National Statistician decided that the HCIs could serve as an important complement to the suite of consumer price indices.
Work has now commenced to develop these indices, releasing focused analytical articles throughout 2017 and beyond that will help shape the production of the final measure. The ONS has subsequently engaged with its advisory panels on a number of development issues. Initial experimental indices were published in December 2017 with further updates in April 2019 and July 2020. However, there are a number of concepts that will need to be explored further. In his statement of 28 June 2019, the National Statistician confirmed plans to produce further experimental publications on an annual basis throughout the development phase, moving to a test run of quarterly production. The Household Cost Indices - national statistic roadmap shows the timeline. Moreover, once National Statistic status for HCIs has been achieved, we will look to develop a HCIs variant (the HCIs - Capital, or HCICs) which will additionally include capital payments for owner occupied housing.
Following the 2015 consultation on consumer price statistics, the National Statistician reached the decision that the Office for National Statistics (ONS) should produce comparable measures of income and price change for different household groups on an annual basis in one publication. We will engage with users to shape further development of the measures.
Much consideration has gone into how comparable measures of income and price change should be produced, and work in the area suggests there may be a case for a “family of indices” to deflate income using different definitions. As such Household Costs Indices may be appropriate to be matched to a microeconomic measure of income. This item ties in with ESCoE’s work stream on democratic measures of income growth which aims to make a wider range of measures available to policy-makers.
Quarter 4 (Oct to Dec) 2021: Release fourth revision of the experimental Household Costs Indices
Quarter 4 2021: Supporting methodological article for the fourth revision of the experimental Household Costs Indices
Quarter 4 2023: Begin test run of quarterly HCIs production
Developing a historical series for Consumer Prices Index (CPI) including owner occupiers’ housing costs (CPIH)
The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) including owner occupiers’ housing costs (CPIH) is the lead measure of inflation and is the most comprehensive measure of consumer price inflation, given its inclusion of owner occupiers’ housing costs (OOH). The current time series extends back to 2005, which is when the rental data sources used to calculate the OOH component for England begin.
To increase the usability of CPIH and provide a longer commentary on the impact of owner occupiers’ housing costs on inflation, a historical series will be modelled for CPIH.
In January 2018 both Advisory Panels on Consumer Prices considered a proposed methodology for the historical series, and the series from 1988 to 2004 was published in December 2018. The series from 1947 to 1987 is being investigated further.
Quarter 2 2021: Publish the CPIH historical series for 1947 to 1987
Medium priority items
Medium priority items form an important part of the work programme but if necessary delivery may be delayed for high priority items.
Developing measures of accuracy for CPIH
Because of the complex survey design, calculating standard errors for CPIH and specifically the growth in CPIH is very challenging.
There are two dimensions to the sampling: selection of items and selection of outlets. The sampling involves purposive sampling of both items and outlets. The CPIH weights come from a variety of sources. Some are administrative sources, some are survey based. They are then put through national accounts balancing. This all makes the estimation of sampling errors difficult.
Also, CPIH weights are price-updated using movements in the appropriate CPIH index, so there is an interaction between weights and prices. Annual rates of change in the price index are ratio estimates, usually over a chain link, so there may be correlations between prices in successive periods that need to be taken into account.
An article on the effect of variance in the weights of CPIH was published in Autumn 2017, and work on the effect of variance in the prices was reviewed by the Advisory Panels on Consumer Prices in 2018.
As a result of this work, we are aiming to publish two papers in academic journals. The first is a review of the literature on producing standard errors for consumer price indices, setting out the different measurement approaches and how they compare, and the second presents updated estimates of components of the CPI sampling variance based on CPIH data.
2021: Academic review of the literature on producing standard errors for consumer price indices
Quarter 3 2021: Publication of interim estimates of components of the CPI sampling variance based on CPIH data
2023: Academic paper presenting estimates of components of the CPI sampling variance based on CPIH data
Review of quality adjustment and monitoring of quality change
One of the more difficult issues in producing consumer price inflation statistics is the accurate measurement and treatment of quality change due to changing product specifications. The Johnson Review considered quality change and recommended we provide more information to explain how quality change is monitored. In response to the 2015 consultation on consumer price statistics some users suggested that ONS should devote more resources to improving and monitoring methods of quality adjustment. In particular the quality adjustment of services could be given more consideration. The Bean Review also considered quality change and found that the issue is likely to grow in importance with the “spreading tentacles of the digital revolution”.
To address these findings a project has been initiated to review quality adjustment methods used in consumer price inflation statistics and provide more detail on how quality adjustment is monitored.
This item ties in with ESCoE’s work stream on measuring activity in services sectors, as the project aims to investigate the deficiencies in the current measures of services activities for the UK and how might they be improved.
Quarter 3 2021: Monitoring tool for between-year quality changes
Quarter 1 2022: Implementation of live quality adjustment monitoring
Quarter 1 2023: Analysis on forced quality adjustment and practical applications of the findings
Among other user interest, in February 2018, an Economy, Jobs and Fair Work Committee of the Scottish Parliament (PDF, 2MB) recommended that a price index for Scotland should be given priority. Regional price indices could also improve the granularity of other high priority work such as the Household Costs Indices and subgroups on a CPIH-consistent basis.
The regular collection of prices for consumer price inflation statistics is optimised for measuring inflation at the UK level. Prices are collected locally in 141 locations spread across Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the 9 regions of England. As a result, the number of locations visited per region is small, making the data less suitable for regional indices.
Additionally, the prices for many products are collected centrally with no regional breakdown. The viability of using the existing price data to produce more geographically disaggregated price indices was assessed in a feasibility report published in November 2017, and the use of small area estimation to improve regional expenditure estimates was explored in a further paper in February 2019.
In Quarter 1 2021, the University of Strathclyde will deliver a report detailing the research done in 2020. The report will (amongst other things) focus on the price data used in the regional CPIH. It will “assess the temporal stability of the regional price quotes and the capacity for price estimation to be improved using model based methods”, along with providing recommendations and proposals for future work and possibilities for regular publication. Following on from this report, the ONS will review the recommendations and explore the necessary follow-up research around the required sample size across the regions in the price quote collection, as well as whether alternative data sources can support regional indices.
Quarter 1 2021: University of Strathclyde “Improving the quality of regional economic indicators: Regional Consumer Prices” report
Quarter 1 2022: Ongoing development work towards the production of regional price indices
Further quality assurance of CPIH
As part of the work to seek re-accreditation for CPIH as a National Statistic, we developed a Quality Assurance of Administrative Data (QAAD) document for our consumer price statistics. The QAAD highlighted a number of areas where the quality assurance for some data sources could be improved.
We continue to seek the required assurance for these sources and will aim to update the QAAD biennially.
Quarter 2 2021: Update to the QAAD for consumer price statistics
Improvements to CPIH methodology
There are a number of ways in which the owner occupiers’ housing costs (OOH) component of CPIH could be further improved. We intend to explore these potential developments to further improve the effectiveness of CPIH as a measure of inflation. These are described in this section.
When the OOH component in CPIH was developed in 2011 using administrative data sources for England, Wales and Scotland, comparable rental data for Northern Ireland were not suitable. At the time the Northern Ireland Housing Executive (NIHE) received private rental data biannually, covering the Belfast Metropolitan Region only. As a result the existing CPI private rental data series for Northern Ireland has continued to be used. Since then the coverage across Northern Ireland has improved and the data are now available monthly and are provided to us on a quarterly basis. We have received an extract of these data from NIHE and started analysis with the ultimate aim of producing a rental index suitable for inclusion in OOH.
Currently, dwelling stock data from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) are used to mix and adjust rental data to reflect the OOH market. However, the property type split is not available on a regional basis, so the same property type split is applied across all regions. We will explore other potential sources of data to improve the stratification.
The Johnson Review identified that recent research into the measurement of rental equivalence has suggested using a flow measure (new lets only), rather than a stock measure (new and existing lets). We will also explore the appropriateness of using this new approach to measuring rental equivalence costs.
In October 2019 we gained access to the Valuation Office Agency’s rental information microdata. This meant we were able to begin developing our private rental price statistics. It is anticipated that the outputs from this development work will eventually be used to measure OOH for the CPIH.
We are mindful of the need to engage extensively with stakeholders about any impact on OOH. We will consider the impact on OOH during this development plan and engage with stakeholders about it separately. We will undertake sensitivity analyses and a parallel run to ensure that users can provide feedback before the estimates are considered for use in CPIH.
2021: Report on the findings of implementing the new rental data source for Northern Ireland in OOH
2021: Present findings from investigation into stock and flow measures of rental equivalence
2021: Improved property type split for stratum weights
2022: Private rental price statistics development
Improvements to elementary aggregate indices
In 2010, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) made a number of changes to the methodology used to collect clothing prices. These changes meant that the gap between RPI and CPI, which use different formulae at the lowest level of aggregation, widened.
The work will consider recommendations from the Johnson Review to review and publish the criteria for formula selection at the lowest level of aggregation.
This work links to the high priority workstream from Part A on a framework for assessing the quality of consumer prices indices produced using alternative data sources.
Quarter 1 2022: Review of criteria for applying elementary aggregate formula, and proposals
Quarter 3 2022: Impact assessment of proposed index criteria
Low priority items
The delivery of low priority items may be delayed or even stopped to ensure the delivery of high and medium priority items.
Review the existing methodology for reconciliation between CPIH and RPI
With the move towards making CPIH the preferred measure of inflation, the ONS has developed a reconciliation between CPIH and RPI, on a consistent basis with that currently published for CPI and RPI. In the longer term, alternative approaches will be investigated, using detailed item-level information.
Quarter 2 2023: Experimental improved reconciliation method
Improvements to OOH(NA)
The ONS currently produce an experimental net acquisitions index for Eurostat, as part of a pilot to incorporate owner occupiers’ housing costs (OOH) costs into the HICP. Currently there is no weight for the component “existing dwellings new to the household” sector, which means that it is given a zero weight in the aggregation. Moreover, the weight for the “acquisition of new dwellings” component includes new dwellings outside the OOH sector (that is, the weight is gross acquisitions, rather than net). The ONS will explore data sources that could be used to improve this experimental index.
2023: Improved methodology for the net acquisitions index
Inclusion of FISIM in CPIH
Financial intermediation services indirectly measured (FISIM) are included in the National Accounts measure of household final consumption expenditure (HHFCE) but are not currently included in consumer price indices. The scope of CPI, which is governed by European legislation, is drawn from the same source as HHFCE and the exclusion of FISIM is one of the biggest differences between the two. As CPIH is not bound by the same legislation, we will consider the suitability of including FISIM as a proxy for the service charge that households pay to banks. A review will include consideration of conceptual appropriateness, international practice and methodology used to calculate a price index for FISIM.
2023: Feasibility study on the inclusion of FISIM in CPIH
The extent to which consumers substitute between outlets
The Johnson Review recommended that the ONS should research the extent to which consumers substitute between outlets. For example, this would capture how prices for the same goods have changed with the move from corner shops to supermarkets and from supermarkets to online providers.
2023: Report on the extent to which consumers substitute between outlets
Manylion cyswllt ar gyfer y Erthygl
Ffôn: +44 (0) 1633 456 900